Fissinger billboard issue to be prosecuted

Things are about to go from bad to worse for the Kaye Fissinger campaign.  On Monday October 26, the Longmont Election Committee found in the affirmative for a Preliminary Hearing on the issue of her billboard.  This could be a very costly fine, well in excess of what the campaign has left over from it’s failed run.  This reminds me of when Jack Pommer was fined a huge sum of money and then used contributions to cover it.  And those poor suckers (and none too bright) who thought they were giving money to help him get elected were really just paying future campaign violations.

In case you didn’t see it, and I bet many of you did, here it is (pictured at right).  As you can see it’s fairly large (look at minivan for scale).  They claim it’s 4′ x 8′.  The invoice for this sign also indicates it was black and white.  Some of it is, but not all of it.  It might be hard to tell but the lettering on the bottom has some color to it as well as the top left, which is pretty obvious.

By the way, the initial complaint and response can be found at this link at the City Clerks website.

The response by the campaigns secretary, Charles Hansen, is almost an admission of guilt in a few places.  First off, it seems imperceptible that the printing of the sign you see (and there are two of them attached to the vehicle) cost $7.38.  There also was no shipping fee (the company is in Las Vegas, NV), but there was 56 cents in tax (apparently picked up in Boulder, CO).   There was also an expense of $42.26 at Lowes for the Masonite panels and hardware used to make these signs.  So we’re supposed to believe the total cost for these items was $49.64?  Ludicrous.

But the more damaging information is the apparent ability to do time travel.
Get this timeline:
July 30 – purchase of panels and hardware at Lowes
August 1 – this sign is first seen at the Boulder County Fair Parade
August 25 – “ORDER DATE” and “DATE REQUIRED” on the invoice for the printing of this sign from Mercury LDO Reprographics
August 31 – date given for the Mercury LDO expenditure on the first campaign report
So we’re supposed to believe the sign seen at the parade wasn’t ordered or printed until 24 days AFTER the parade?  There is no proof in the supplied documents in the response that shows the printing was made prior to August 1st (expect it to magically appear now).  Unless, the actual printing for this sign was done earlier and logically (look at the sign again) was much more expensive than $7.38.  But there’s no accounting for that anywhere.
The expense of the vehicle must also be accounted for, there is no other way to transport or display this sign.  It is not “ the regular course of daily activities” as the response says.  The picture you see was taken off the Diagonal Hwy during rush hour for the sole purpose of electioneering.  The vehicle was parked near the railroad tracks and was blocking access to private property.  The van wasn’t just parked, it was strategically placed and the driver was in the vehicle.  While the driver can claim he was volunteering his time, the same might not be said for the transporting and displaying by the vehicle.  No vehicle, no sign viewing.  That expense should be accounted for and was not as an expenditure or in-kind contribution.

Each possible violation carries a fine of $100/day for up to 10 days.  If the Election Committee finds both as being violations of 2.04.207 of the Longmont Fair Campaign Practices Act, the total fine could be $2,000.  The committee just fined Longmont Leadership Committee and showed no leniency in the fine, sticking to the ordinance.  It will now be seen if they will distribute these fines in a fair and equitable manner.

Of course, the election is now over and as I predicted Kaye Fissinger finished 4th out of 5 candidates, beating out Ed Dloughy who didn’t even campaign.  Seems this traveling billboard may have been a negative as it reminded everyone exactly who and what she was, and they just couldn’t stomach voting for her.

Tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

About Chris Rodriguez

Chris is the editor/publisher of LightningRod Blog - as well as founder/editor of Wrongmont, Longmont Advocate, Vote!Longmont, Longmont Politics, the LightningRod Radio Network, as well as being the original Longmont Examiner. Chris is a writer and talker - whether it be blogs, podcasts, music, or public speaking. When he's not heard on Air Traffic radio, he can be heard on his podcasts or seen in the local paper causing trouble.

5 Responses to Fissinger billboard issue to be prosecuted

  1. AJ says:

    While I fully understand the purpose of the complaint and feel it is mostly valid, I think a few minutes of research would have served well:

    Mercury LDO has Colorado offices, the closest being Boulder. ( It’s likely plausible that their corporate office is in Las Vegas, which explains the remittance address on the invoice.

    I’ve also recently purchased masonite from Lowe’s, and those prices are about right.

    Obviously, the sign is much bigger than Mr. Hanson says, and the printing of the sign surely seems cheap. It would be interesting to request an order from Mercury LDO for roughly the same product and see what the quote comes back as.

  2. Anonymous says:

    I’m not focused on the price per se, but how her campaign manager scrambled to provide documentation about it after people questioned it. As for the size, it looks about right to me based on how it looks up against the van.

    BUT, the bigger question is the DATE. As you mentioned, the date does not match up to the expense, given that she used these billboards in the parade on August 1st. Then the discrepancy with the date on the provided documentation does not match up at all to the report.

    Wasn’t Longmont Leadership cited because of a fund obligation date being a few days before it was stated? In Fissinger’s case, it appears to be almost a full 30 days.

  3. Anonymous says:

    I saw the invoice, doesn’t it say B&W and her billboards have color?

  4. AJ says:

    Oh yes – the dates are very much off, as you noted.

    And yes, I see at least 3 colors in her billboard. And as for the size… we have a minivan similar to the one photographed. Taking my tape measure to our van, and comparing locations with that sign on where it would be on our van… it appears to be roughly 9′ long and about 6′ high. This would fit the need for two 4’x8′ sheets of masonite.

    I’m also *extremely* surprised that a printshop only charges $0.12 per square foot of printing. That’s not much more than a typical 8.5×11 photocopy.

    Very odd stuff – thanks for pointing all of this out. 🙂

  5. Anonymous says:

    This wouldn’t be an issue had she not gone after others for infractions during the campaign.

    He who cast the first stone…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *